MobX vs. Redux vs. Zustand: which state manager to choose in 2025?
Effective global state management stands as an essential challenge during React application development. Front-end developers working in 2025 are mostly choosing options like Redux, MobX, and Zustand, as all three offer different approaches to state management. The enhanced React hooks and Context APIs cannot replace the necessity of specialized state managers in complex projects. Redux […]
Technologies

Effective global state management stands as an essential challenge during React application development.
Front-end developers working in 2025 are mostly choosing options like Redux, MobX, and Zustand, as all three offer different approaches to state management. The enhanced React hooks and Context APIs cannot replace the necessity of specialized state managers in complex projects. Redux provides strict state control while MobX offers reactive updates with minimal boilerplate code and Zustand combines ease of use with excellent performance.
Selecting the appropriate state manager is critical to the success of your project.
Redux is the most structured and predictable state manager. It is primarily based on immutability, a centralized store, and unidirectional data flow through actions and reducers. It affords a stable framework around which it’s easier to construct complicated functions. In 2025, Redux still dominates the enterprise sector and is supported by a huge community, so you’ll never be alone with a problem. Redux provides strict state management but requires more time to configure to ensure future scalability.

MobX uses observables to automatically update dependent components. This removes the need to use dispatch, and the logic for updating the state seems as natural as possible. MobX allows you to change the state directly, and the library decides which components must be updated. This allows you to write low code to manage the state while providing powerful automatic updating abilities. By 2025, MobX will be a good choice for developers who already know the library or want an alternative to Redux without the template. MobX is well-suited for medium and small projects, as well as for applications with a large number of interdependent states.
Zustand is simple and un-opinionated, it does not wrap your app in content providers like how we do with Redux. It mainly uses hooks as a means of communicating back and forth with the state. In addition, Zustand automatically optimizes state subscriptions, which prevents unnecessary re-reads. Zustand is becoming more and more popular for small and startup projects, as well as for parts of large systems that require simple states without complex logic. In 2025, this library has become almost identical to Redux in terms of community recognition, which indicates developer recognition.
All three state management options retain their relevance as of 2025 because they excel in various specific use cases.
A proficient React developer selects the appropriate tool for each project rather than being restricted to one specific solution.
In order to pick between Redux, MobX, and Zustand, developers must consider future project scaling requirements along with state performance needs and levels of state predictability control. A combination of Redux for centralized management of state alongside MobX for reactive state updates and Zustand for simple module implementations proves effective in numerous scenarios.
Creating sustainable projects depends on writing code that remains clean and easy to maintain throughout its lifecycle. The key objective is to deliver code that remains understandable and maintainable regardless of the technology used.
At Swan Software Solutions, we believe that we succeed when our clients succeed. If you need the right technology partner to help your business, contact us to schedule a free assessment.